Thursday, February 17, 2011

Scientists build first anti-laser

Physicists have built the world's first device that can cancel out a laser beam - a so-called anti-laser.

The device, created by a team from Yale University, is capable of absorbing an incoming laser beam entirely.

But this is not intended as a defence against high-power laser weapons, the researchers said.

Instead they think it could be used in next-generation supercomputers which will be built with components that use light rather than electrons.

Professor Douglas Stone and colleagues at Yale University had initially been developing a theory to explain which materials could be used as the basis of lasers.

Strange lasers

Recent advances in laser design have resulted in a number of unusual devices that do not fit the traditional concept of a laser, Professor Stone explained.

"So we were working on a theory that could predict what could be used to form a laser," he said.

That theory also predicted that instead of amplifying light into coherent pulses, as a laser does, it should be possible to create a device that absorbs laser light hitting it, said Professor Stone - an anti-laser.

The have now succeeded in building one.

Their device focuses two lasers beams of a specific frequency into a specially designed optical cavity made from silicon, which traps the incoming beams of light and forces them to bounce around until all their energy is dissipated.

In a paper published in the journal Science they demonstrated that the anti-laser could adsorb 99.4 per cent of incoming light, for a specific wavelength.

Light speed

Altering the wavelength of the incoming light means that the anti-laser can effectively be turned on and off - and that could be used in optical switches, Professor Stone told BBC News.

Building something which can absorb light over a wide range of wavelengths is pretty simple, said Professor Stone, but only doing so for a particular wavelength makes the anti-laser potentially useful in optical computing.

The anti-laser's big advantage is that it is built using silicon, which is already widely used in computing.

It would not, however, be much use as a laser shield, according to Professor Stone.

"The energy gets dissipated as heat. So if someone sets a laser on you with enough power to fry you, the anti-laser won't stop you from frying," he said.



Powered By WizardRSS

IBM's Watson crowned trivia king

<!-- Embedding the video player --> <!-- This is the embedded player component -->
<!-- embedding script -->
<!-- companion banner --> <!-- END - companion banner --><!-- caption -->

Jeopardy! champions Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter revealed what it felt like to "represent the human race" against IBM's supercomputer Watson.

<!-- END - caption -->
<!-- end of the embedded player component --> <!-- Player embedded -->

IBM's supercomputer Watson has trounced its two competitors in a televised show pitting human brains against computer bytes.

After a three night marathon on the quiz show Jeopardy, Watson emerged victorious to win a $1million (�622,000) prize.

The computer's competitors were two of the most successful players ever to have taken part in Jeopardy.

But in the end their skill at the game was no match for Watson.

Ken Jennings had previously notched up 74 consecutive wins on the show - the most ever - while Brad Rutter had won the most amount of money, $3million (�1.9m).

"I for one welcome our new computer overlords," Mr Jennings wrote along with his correct final Jeopardy question.

Search for meaning

But the victory for Watson and IBM was about more than money. It was about ushering in a new era in computing where machines will increasingly be able to learn and understand what humans are really asking them for.

Jeopardy is seen as a significant challenge for Watson because of the show's rapid fire format and clues that rely on subtle meanings, puns, and riddles; something humans excel at and computers do not.

On the night of the grand finale, IBM announced a research agreement with speech recognition firm Nuance Communications, to "explore, develop and commercialise" the Watson computing system's advanced analytics capabilities in the health care industry.

The technology behind Watson has the ability to scan and analyse information from many more resources than a human can in a short period of time, potentially aiding doctors in diagnosing patients quickly.

"We can transform the way that health care professionals accomplish everyday tasks by enabling them to work smarter and more efficiently," said Dr John E Kelly III, senior vice president and director of IBM research.

Other possible applications for Watson's technology include dealing with big sets of data commonly found in the legal and financial worlds.

Fair fight

There is little doubt that Watson's win stirred up a host of emotions.

Paul Miller of the technology blog Engadget.com was moderately impressed.

"Start Quote

I was rooting for the humans"

End Quote Daniel Terdiman CNet.com

"It's obvious that IBM's DeepQA research programme has developed some of the most sophisticated natural language AI known to man. At the same time, Jeopardy questions aren't really that hard... all three contestants knew the answer most of the time, but Watson was just quicker on the draw.

"Of course, it's no surprise that computers have quicker reflexes, so why shouldn't Watson get to use his inbuilt advantage to the utmost? It seems like a fair fight to us."

Daniel Terdiman of news website CNet watched the final with IBM staff at an event at the company's Silicon Valley research centre.

"I was rooting for the humans," he said.

Who is Bram Stoker?

Twitter was alight with praise and condemnation for the machine's victory.

The comments ranged from "Robot Apocalypse, here we come" to "IBM's Watson dominates Ken Jennings, turns attention to plotting our demise".

One user wrote: "next challenge for #Watson: The Price is Right".

The final Jeopardy category was 19th century novelists.

And the answer: William Wilkinson's "An Account of the Principalities of Wallachia and Moldavia" inspired this author's most famous novel.

The question - which all three contestants got right was "Who is Bram Stoker?"

Watson wagered $17,973 (�11,154) to cement his victory.

In the end Watson accumulated $77,147 (�47,923) versus Mr Jennings' total of $24,000 (�14,907) and Mr Rutter's $21,600 (�12,416).



Powered By WizardRSS

Google unveils 10% One Pass fee

Google has launched a new payment system that allows users to subscribe to online content for a 10% commission fee.

The move comes after rival Apple was criticised over its payment system which takes 30% of the sale price.

One Pass will work on tablets and smartphones, as well as Google-related websites.

One Pass will launch initially in the UK, Canada, France, Germany, Italy and Spain.

The announcement came just one day after Apple announced new rules for publishers selling subscriptions on its iOS platform.

Apple says companies must now offer users the option to buy directly through an iTunes account, handing 30% of the price to Apple.

Previously, vendors were allowed to simply direct customers to an external website, keeping all of the profits.

On a Google blog posting, Lee Shirani, the company's director of business product management wrote: "Publishers can customise how and when they charge for content while experimenting with different models to see what works best for them."



Powered By WizardRSS

Cyber crime &#39;costs �27bn a year&#39;

Cyber crime costs the UK economy �27bn a year, the government has said.

The figures, published for the first time, are a mid-range estimate and the real cost could be much higher.

They are made up of �21bn of costs to businesses, �2.2bn to government and �3.1bn to citizens.

Security minister Baroness Neville-Jones said the government was determined to work with industry to tackle cyber crime.

At the moment, cyber criminals are "fearless but they do not think they will be caught", she said in a briefing in central London.

'Frightening'

But efforts to get a grip on the problem had been hampered by firms who did not want to admit they had been the victims of attacks for fear of "reputational damage".

This also meant that it was difficult to accurately estimate the cost to the economy - and "worst case scenario" was likely to be much greater than �27bn.

"It is a bit like terrorism - the more you know the more frightening it looks," said Baroness Neville-Jones.

But she said the government was not at "panic stations", adding that it had a strategy to tackle the problem and had committed �650m over the next four years to it.

Prime Minister David Cameron and Foreign Secretary William Hague had met the bosses of some of Britain's biggest businesses, including Barclays, HSBC, Tesco and BA, on Monday to urge them to take the problem more seriously.

Baroness Neville-Jones said ministers would be unveiling a plan to disrupt cyber criminals and ensure more of them were prosecuted "in the spring" and had agreed to form a joint working group with industry to tackle the problem.

Martin Sutherland, chief executive of Detrica, the consultancy which compiled the report with the Cabinet Office, said the perpetrators of cyber crime ranged from "state-sponsored" activists to organised crime gangs down to "spotty teenagers sitting in their bedrooms".

Nearly half of the �21bn cost to business was made up of intellectual property theft - which included illegal downloading and file sharing. But industrial espionage, such as the theft of designs and commercial secrets, was also a significant problem.

The hardest-hit sectors were pharmaceuticals, biotech, electronics, IT and chemicals.



Powered By WizardRSS

IBM&#39;s Watson crowned trivia king

IBM's supercomputer Watson has trounced its two competitors in a televised show pitting human brains against computer bytes.

After a three night marathon on the quiz show Jeopardy, Watson emerged victorious to win a $1million (�622,000) prize.

The computer's competitors were two of the most successful players ever to have taken part in Jeopardy.

But in the end their skill at the game was no match for Watson.

Ken Jennings had previously notched up 74 consecutive wins on the show - the most ever - while Brad Rutter had won the most amount of money, $3million (�1.9m).

"I for one welcome our new computer overlords," Mr Jennings wrote along with his correct final Jeopardy question.

Search for meaning

But the victory for Watson and IBM was about more than money. It was about ushering in a new era in computing where machines will increasingly be able to learn and understand what humans are really asking them for.

Jeopardy is seen as a significant challenge for Watson because of the show's rapid fire format and clues that rely on subtle meanings, puns, and riddles; something humans excel at and computers do not.

On the night of the grand finale, IBM announced a research agreement with speech recognition firm Nuance Communications, to "explore, develop and commercialise" the Watson computing system's advanced analytics capabilities in the health care industry.

The technology behind Watson has the ability to scan and analyse information from many more resources than a human can in a short period of time, potentially aiding doctors in diagnosing patients quickly.

"We can transform the way that health care professionals accomplish everyday tasks by enabling them to work smarter and more efficiently," said Dr John E Kelly III, senior vice president and director of IBM research.

Other possible applications for Watson's technology include dealing with big sets of data commonly found in the legal and financial worlds.

Fair fight

There is little doubt that Watson's win stirred up a host of emotions.

Paul Miller of the technology blog Engadget.com was moderately impressed.

"Start Quote

I was rooting for the humans"

End Quote Daniel Terdiman CNet.com

"It's obvious that IBM's DeepQA research programme has developed some of the most sophisticated natural language AI known to man. At the same time, Jeopardy questions aren't really that hard... all three contestants knew the answer most of the time, but Watson was just quicker on the draw.

"Of course, it's no surprise that computers have quicker reflexes, so why shouldn't Watson get to use his inbuilt advantage to the utmost? It seems like a fair fight to us."

Daniel Terdiman of news website CNet watched the final with IBM staff at an event at the company's Silicon Valley research centre.

"I was rooting for the humans," he said.

Who is Bram Stoker?

Twitter was alight with praise and condemnation for the machine's victory.

The comments ranged from "Robot Apocalypse, here we come" to "IBM's Watson dominates Ken Jennings, turns attention to plotting our demise".

One user wrote: "next challenge for #Watson: The Price is Right".

The final Jeopardy category was 19th century novelists.

And the answer: William Wilkinson's "An Account of the Principalities of Wallachia and Moldavia" inspired this author's most famous novel.

The question - which all three contestants got right was "Who is Bram Stoker?"

Watson wagered $17,973 (�11,154) to cement his victory.

In the end Watson accumulated $77,147 (�47,923) versus Mr Jennings' total of $24,000 (�14,907) and Mr Rutter's $21,600 (�12,416).



Powered By WizardRSS