Thursday, November 3, 2011

Google acts on 'paedophile' claim

A business owner accused in a Google review of being a paedophile and a thief has said he is delighted that the search giant has removed the entry.

The message was placed on Google's Places review service 18 months ago.

Toni Bennett said he had planned legal action to force Google to delete the false posting after the firm said it did not qualify for removal.

The move comes amid calls on the internet giant to address the rapidly growing problem of fake online reviews.

Online reputation consultants say Google should review its policies and take part in an "honest web summit".

Accusation

A comment by "Paul" was posted on Google's site about Mr Bennett's business - That Computer Chap - on 26 April 2010.

A few days later, Mr Bennett saw it while checking his listings.

"I had to re-read it a few times, to check it was talking about me," he told the BBC.

"I was absolutely gobsmacked."

The review said: "Robbed My RAM and Touched 9 Year Old What a scam artist, he stole RAM from my computer and replaced it with smaller chips hoping I wouldnt notice and also I later found out touched my 9 year old inappropriately. A Violator and a rogue trader. DO NOT DO TRADE WITH THIS MAN!"

Mr Bennett contacted Google on numerous occasions through email.

The IT consultant said that he called a directory assistance service for a contact number, but when he called it no-one answered.

He went to the police, but he said that while they acknowledged the allegations against him were false, they were powerless to intervene.

"It's mad, it's just mad that someone can do this and it's so anonymous that someone can put on something about a crime against a child - you can't get any worse than that, bar killing somebody. And they can get away with it."

Legal action

Mr Bennett estimated that he has lost 80% of his local business. As a result, he said he had intended to sue Google for defamation.

Google told the BBC that it did not comment on individual cases.

"We have rules against things like hate speech or impersonation, but we're not in a position to arbitrate disputes," a company statement said.

"However, we've built a free system that allows business owners to claim their listing, which means that they can then respond to reviews and share their side of the story."

However, the company later removed the posting. It told the BBC that from time to time it re-reviews comments flagged as inappropriate.

Reputation

Chris Emmins set up Kwikchex eight months ago.

The firm offers businesses and consumers help tackling inaccurate feedback posted online and other reputation issues. It is part of a growing industry.

So far Kwikcheck said it had dealt with 3,000 cases of online defamation. Mr Emmins added that it was possible to sabotage a business within five minutes, and that the problem was widespread.

"I think of all the review resources we're looking at at the moment, we are particularly critical of Google," he said.

"You can't really trust anything. There is no verification process whatsoever... There is no easy way of having falsehoods removed."

It is difficult to know how many review sites there are on the web.

From Tripadvisor and badtattoos.com to yetanotherreviewsite.co.uk, tens of thousands spring up every year.

Mr Emmins wants the internet firms to take more responsibility for their content.

He called for Google, Tripadvisor and other review sites to get together for an "honest web summit."

A change in the law could be needed. The relevant statutes were drafted back in the 1990s, when review sites didn't even exist.

"Freedom of speech is a fantastically valuable thing," Mr Emmins said, "but at the moment it's being corrupted entirely... through lack of diligence and possibly lack of ethics."

"The resolutions aren't that difficult."



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement

MPs urge action on mobile auction

A committee of UK MPs has criticised mobile operators for fighting over how to share out the airwaves that will deliver next-generation services.

The radio spectrum auction will provide more bandwidth for operators.

The Commons Culture, Media and Sport select committee urged operators to stop delaying the process.

The UK is currently on track to be one of the last European countries to hold its 4G auction. Regulator Ofcom hopes to hold the sale mid-2012.

O2 and Vodafone have threatened legal action if the auction goes ahead in its current form.

John Whittingdale MP, Chair of the Committee, said: "Ofcom has had a very difficult job adjudicating between competing and polarised interests, and we are concerned that constant disagreement and special pleading from the four mobile network operators appears to have further delayed the spectrum auction.

"We believe that the basic rules for the auction which Ofcom has laid down are sensible and fair, and that further delays will result in the UK falling further behind in this vital area. The auction needs to proceed as soon as possible," he added.

Spectrum gift

The sale of airwaves freed up by the switch-over to digital TV is seen as key to providing the much-needed bandwidth for data services following the exponential rise of smartphones.

The spectrum being auctioned is particularly valuable because it is low frequency and therefore covers greater distances.

It is also better at penetrating buildings, crucial as more consumers use their smartphones to surf the web at home.

Three has always claimed that it is at a disadvantage to the other three operators because it has no 2G spectrum. It also claims it is unfair that the other operators have been "gifted" 2G spectrum by the UK government.

It was further angered by a decision made by Ofcom in January to allow O2, Vodafone and Everything Everywhere to reuse their 2G spectrum for 3G services.

The select committee looked at that decision and concluded that it had not "permanently distorted the market in favour of those licence holders".

However it did voice concern that the proposed spectrum sale by Everything Everywhere may result in the company making a substantial profit from a public asset that was granted to it for free.

It said that the government and Ofcom should look into mechanisms to ensure that at least a significant proportion of the proceeds be used to benefit consumers.

Clashes

Ofcom has made clear that it wants Three to remain as a competitor in the UK mobile landscape because it has ensured that consumers get innovative services and low prices.

In its proposals for the spectrum auctions the watchdog set mechanisms to ensure that Three got a portion of the 4G spectrum at a minimum price.

This angered O2 and Vodafone who threatened legal action over the floors, claiming they amounted to state-aid for Three.

The committee said that in its view, Ofcom's proposals were the right ones.

Ofcom also proposed that one of the spectrum licences should have a condition of providing mobile internet coverage to least 95% of the population.

The Committee said that Ofcom should go further to hasten the rollout of broadband and set it at 98%.

It also argued that the regulator should consider applying this obligation to more than one licence.

Ofcom is holding a second consultation, due to end in December, to finalise how the auction should work.

During the course of this month all four mobile operators will meet with the regulator and government to find the best solution to the issue.



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement