Tuesday, April 19, 2011

EU to investigate net-neutrality

The European Union is to investigate whether internet service providers (ISPs) are providing fair access to online services.

It may lead to new rules banning ISPs from restricting access to data-heavy services during peak periods.

ISPs argue that traffic management is key to maintaining a quality service.

However, the EU's annnouncement falls short of the demands of net-neutrality campaigners, who want all traffic to be treated equally.

The investigation will cover both mobile and fixed providers and will be published by the end of the year.

Announcing the action, the EU's commissioner for the digital agenda, Neelie Kroes, said: "I am absolutely determined that everyone in the EU should have the chance to enjoy the benefits of an open and lawful internet, without hidden restrictions or slower speeds than they have been promised.

"The Commission has asked the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (Berec) to undertake a rigorous fact-finding exercise on issues crucial to ensuring an open and neutral internet."

She added that the investigation will also ask businesses and consumers to highlight shortcomings, and if the findings indicate "outstanding problems" they will assess further measures.

Consumer choice

In her statement, Ms Kroes referred to a claim that an unnamed UK provider was reportedly making "Skype calls technically impossible in afternoons and evenings without warning the users."

She also pointed to reports that some internet providers were slowing video-streaming services provided by a competitor.

"Start Quote

A consumer's experience is not affected if an e-mail reaches him a few seconds after it has been sent"

End Quote Neelie Kroes European Union

"Mark my words," she said. "If measures to enhance competition are not enough to bring internet providers to offer real consumer choice, I'm ready to prohibit the blocking of lawful services or applications."

However, Ms Kroes said it was "widely accepted" that some services needed to be slowed down to allow others to work.

"A consumer's experience is not affected if an e-mail reaches him a few seconds after it has been sent, whereas a similar delay to a voice communication would cause it to be significantly degraded, if not rendered entirely useless."

She argued that consumer pressure and media scrutiny would mean providers blocking or charging extra for bandwidth-heavy services would soon lose custom.

Campaigner worry

Tuesday's announcement has left some campaigners for "net-neutrality" - the concept that access to all services on the internet should be treated equally - disappointed.

They had hoped for a firmer decision from the commission, and worry that without stricter measures ISPs may begin charging companies for unrestricted access to consumers.

This would, they argue, create a "two-tiered" internet, with big businesses offering faster access to consumers while smaller businesses suffer.

Advocates of net-neutrality insist a fair internet is vital to foster competition and innovation, and that policies to prevent such practices should be put in place sooner rather than later.

"The internet after all is about openness, choice and participation," said Monique Goyens, director general of the European Consumers' Organisation.

<!-- Embedding the video player --> <!-- This is the embedded player component -->
<!-- embedding script -->
<!-- companion banner --> <!-- END - companion banner --><!-- caption -->

Web inventor Sir Tim Berners-Lee believes legislation may be needed to protect net neutrality

<!-- END - caption -->
<!-- end of the embedded player component --> <!-- Player embedded -->

"If ISPs misuse their control of internet traffic, then these essential qualities are lost.

"This race of technological advances is high-speed and, to remain fair, requires a referee. The EU needs take on this role while giving national regulatory authorities the means to do the same."

Sir Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the web, told the BBC that governments must act if the industry can not self-regulate.

He has been asked by the UK government to negotiate an agreement on an open internet between service providers and content firms like the BBC and Skype.

"If it fails, the government has to be absolutely ready to legislate," he said.



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text Feed | Amazon AffiliateHud Settlement Statement

Many under-13s &#39;using Facebook&#39;

Almost half of British children aged 9 to 12 use social networking, ignoring minimum age limits, a report claims.

One in five has a Facebook page, a quarter of which are publicly viewable, according to EUKidsOnline.

The report's authors suggest that removing age requirements would make it easier to monitor young people's online activity.

However, children's charity Kidscape criticised the idea and warned it would lead to more cyber bullying.

The research, carried out by the London School of Economics for the European Commission, was based on a survey of 25,000 young people - aged between nine and 16 - from across Europe.

It asked if they maintained a social networking profile.

In the UK, 43% of 9 to 12-year-olds answered yes, along with 88% of 13 to 16-year-olds.

The Netherlands had the highest percentage of children on social networks at 70% - however many of these were users of Hyves, a site that does not have a minimum age.

Across Europe the average figure for 9 to 12-year-olds was 38%.

Report author Elisabeth Staksrud, from the University of Oslo, told BBC News that it was inevitable children would be drawn to sites such as Facebook: "If you're twelve you want to be where your peers are".

"Start Quote

Children are children, adults are adults. Sometimes you have to say no to your child."

End Quote Peter Bradley Kidscape
Parental guidance

The report also suggests that where parents do impose a strict policy on social networking, the majority of young people respect that guidance.

In France, 45% of parents said their children were forbidden from using social networking sites, the highest of any country in the survey.

Consequently, that country had the lowest proportion of children using social networking at 25%.

Peter Bradley, from child protection charity Kidscape, said it showed that parents must be firm with their children when it comes to internet use.

"Children are children, adults are adults. Sometimes you have to say no to your child," he said.

'Cop out'

However, Elisabeth Staksrud believes that by acknowledging children below the age of 13 are using services, social networking sites could develop measures to protect them.

"Since children often lie about their age to join 'forbidden' sites it would be more practical to identify younger users and to target them with easy-to-use protective measures," she said.

The report concedes that while this approach would help keep existing users safer, it could also lead to a substantial increase in underage children signing up.

Mr Bradley told the BBC he strongly believed that lowering the minimum age for Facebook would be wrong.

"Without doubt, if the age limit was removed from Facebook, the effect would be an increase in the number of young people accessing the site," he told the BBC.

"Automatically you'll have a greater increase of those at risk of bullying online.

"Abolishing the age limit is an absolute cop out really."



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text Feed | Amazon AffiliateHud Settlement Statement

Police put court news on Twitter

Results from cases heard at Birmingham Magistrates' Court are being put on Twitter by West Midlands Police.

Ch Supt Stephen Armstrong said there had been a decline in court reporting in recent years and the initiative was designed to make the public more aware of the cases police deal with.

The force is sending its own staff into court to cover the cases.

It said the updates on the micro-blogging site were the first ever "tweet-a-thon" from a justice centre.

The tweets from the Grade-I listed Victorian courthouse began on Tuesday morning. Police said it was too early to say if Tuesday's initiative would be repeated.

'Peace of mind'

Mr Armstrong said: "We've seen over recent years a bit of a decline in court reporting, particularly through local newspapers as they've faced their own financial constraints.

"That's tended to result in the general public not knowing what happens in court and what the outcomes at courts are.

"And this is our opportunity to raise that interest again and to show people there is a vast amount of police business going through courts and people are being dealt with and sentenced and punished for what they've done."

Assistant Chief Constable Garry Forsyth said: "West Midlands Police has truly embraced social media in our attempts to engage with audiences we have traditionally struggled to reach, including young people.

"Many officers across the force region now regularly update their communities via Twitter, blogs and Facebook... and we're about to launch a new Twitter account to track our police helicopter.

"We hope that the 'tweet-a-thon' from Birmingham Magistrates' Court will give people a flavour for the range of offenders we deal with, an insight into the court system and, importantly, peace of mind that justice is being done."



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text Feed | Amazon AffiliateHud Settlement Statement

Monday, April 18, 2011

Attacks on critical systems rise

Internet-based attacks on critical systems such as gas, power and water have increased around the world, a report suggests.

Security firm McAfee surveyed 200 IT executives working for utility companies in 14 countries.

Eight out of 10 said their networks had been targeted by hackers during the past year.

China was seen as the most likely source of attacks, followed by Russia and the United States.

The number of reported incidents was higher than in 2009 when just over half of those asked said they had fallen victim.

Denial of service

Most of the reported security breaches took the form of distributed denial of service (DDOS) attacks.

These typically involve a network of computers, under the control of criminals, overwhelming a company's internet-connected systems.

While such incidents have the potential to impact websites and corporate networks, researchers said it was unlikely they were intended to cut off energy supplies.

However, there remained a possibility that DDOS attacks could do more harm in future, according to Stewart Baker, a former US national security advisor to President George W Bush and one of the report's authors.

"We asked what what the likelihood was of a major attack that causes significant outage.

"That is one that causes severe loss of services for at least 24 hours, loss of life or personal injury or failure of a company.

"Three quarters thought it would happen within the next two years," he said.

Stuxnet

Arguably the best known example of an internet-bourne threat disrupting an industrial system is the Stuxnet worm, which was discovered in 2010.

Analysis suggests that the malicious computer code was specifically designed to take control of machinery in either Iran's Bushehr or Natanz nuclear facilities.

While it was known that the worm had spread more widely than its intended target, McAfee's research suggested the full extend of its reach.

Among those utility companies that had carried out a search for Stuxnet on their computer systems, 40% found traces of it.

"It probably didn't result in any obvious interference with the systems, because it wasn't designed to do that," said Mr Baker.

"But the fact that it spread so widely and could have done so if it had been differently designed is very, very troubling if you are worried about cyber attacks by hostile nations or extortion attempts by well organised criminal gangs."

Government help

Respondents were also questioned about how much involvement they had with their governments on tackling cyber security issues.

Japan came out on top, along with China and the United Arab Emirates, although the survey did not ask if that cooperation was voluntary or enforced.

The United Kingdom scored lowest of all those taking part in the study.

A Cabinet Office spokesman told the BBC that the situation had improved dramatically since the launch of its National Security Strategy in October 2010.

The policy document recognises cyber attacks as one of the top four national security threats facing the country.

"We have recently launched an initiative with the private sector to help develop greater awareness of the threats and better protection for dealing with them," said the spokesman.



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text Feed | Amazon AffiliateHud Settlement Statement

Piracy hunt law firm facing costs

A controversial law firm that tried to get money from computer users by accusing them of illegal file sharing could be hit with massive legal fees.

ACS:Law and its one solicitor, Andrew Crossley, sent thousands of letters threatening recipients with court action if they did not pay out.

Now a judge has ruled that the company may be responsible for wasted costs in the case and ordered a full hearing.

Mr Crossley's lawyers declined to comment.

The proceedings represent something of a role reversal. Originally the Patents County Court had been asked to hear the cases brought by Mr Crossley's firm.

After those collapsed, it was decided that he might be liable for costs.

Those could run into thousands of pounds, although that money is likely to be covered by solicitors' insurance.

Lawyer's letters

ACS:Law had originally teamed-up with a company called MediaCAT, which purported to represent copyright owners, such as film and music producers.

Together they sent letters to around 10,000 people in the UK, alleging that the IP addresses of their computers had been linked to illegal file sharing.

Individuals were given the option of paying �500 or facing court action.

Many of those contacted said they had never engaged in such activity and accused ACS:Law of carrying out a speculative "fishing" exercise.

Mr Crossley eventually brought 26 cases to court, but soon after hearings began he tried to have them dismissed, claiming he had been attacked and received death threats.

Judge Colin Birss QC refused to allow proceedings to stop and accused Mr Crossley of trying to "to avoid judicial scrutiny".

Soon after, both ACS:Law and MediaCAT were wound-up.

Profit share

It emerged in court that the two companies had agreed on a profit-sharing model, with ACS:Law receiving 65% of any money recovered.

In his most recent ruling, Mr Birss said that arrangement had "brought the legal profession into disrepute".

He also branded the now-defunct firm "amateurish and slipshod".

The court's decision to press ahead with a hearing on wasted costs was welcomed by lawyers representing those people who received ACS:Law letters.

Michael Forrester, from Ralli Solicitors, said his firm was also planning to pursue claims for harassment against Mr Crossley and urged anyone who was affected to join the action.

"It can be incredibly upsetting for people to receive these letters and they may well have a claim in harassment, so I am urging them to come forward."

Mr Crossley's application for permission to appeal was refused. He is also being investigated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text Feed | Amazon AffiliateHud Settlement Statement

Robots venture inside Fukushima



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text Feed | Amazon AffiliateHud Settlement Statement

Friday, April 15, 2011

Fry in Twitter joke jail &#39;pledge&#39;

Comedian Stephen Fry has said he is "prepared to go to prison" over the "Twitter joke" trial.

Fry was appearing at a benefit gig for Paul Chambers who is appealing to the High Court against his conviction for sending a menacing communication.

He had tweeted: "Robin Hood Airport is closed. You've got a week... otherwise I'm blowing the airport sky high!"

Fry argued that Chambers' tweet was an example of Britain's tradition of self-deprecating humour and banter.

Appeal funds

Chambers' case has become a cause celebre on Twitter, with hundreds of people reposting his original comments in protest at the conviction.

"This [verdict] must not be allowed to stand in law," Fry said, adding that he would continue to repeat Chambers' message and face prison "if that's what it takes".

Among the other celebrities lending their support to the fundraising evening were Al Murray, Rufus Hound, Katy Brand and Father Ted writer Graham Linehan.

Linehan told the audience: "We've got this incredible tool and we should fight any attempt to take it out of our hands."

The benefit gig, at London's Bloomsbury Theatre, aimed to raise funds for Chambers' appeal.

Freedom of speech

The aim of the organisers is that he will not be forced to drop his case because of the possibility he would have to pay the prosecution's legal costs were he to lose.

Few of the stars were prepared to assign wisdom to Chambers' original tweet, however.

Sitting inconspicuously in the stalls, he was variously described as a knucklehead, a nerd and a "donut".

Murray even branded the gig the "Save Paul Chambers from his own stupid destiny event".

But everyone seemed united by a desire to protect freedom of speech or at least the ability to recognise the difference between jokes and menacing terrorist threats.

Chambers' lawyer, David Allen Green, also addressed the audience, briefing them on the key details of his case.

'Speak freely'

Although he was careful not to criticise the courts, he said the decision to find his client guilty "does not make me proud to be an officer of the court".

"We should be able to have banter," he concluded. "We should be able to speak freely without the threat of legal coercion."

Chambers, of Balby, Doncaster, sent the message to his 600 followers in the early hours of 6 January 2010 - he claimed it was in a moment of frustration after Robin Hood Airport in South Yorkshire was closed by snow.

He was found guilty in May 2010 and fined �385 and told to pay �600 costs.

His appeal is likely to go before the High Court later this year.



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text Feed | Amazon AffiliateHud Settlement Statement

Google denies Panda hit on rival

Google has defended recent changes to its search system that reduced the prominence of some popular websites.

One of the worst hit by the "Panda" update was Ciao.co.uk, a Microsoft-owned company that had been leading an EU competition case against Google.

Its web visibility fell by 94% according to analysis by Searchmetrics.

Google's head of search evaluation, Scott Huffman, said it was "almost absurd" to suggest that the results were rigged.

The company regularly changes the algorithms that determine what users sees when they search for something.

Rankings

Such updates are often done to weed out "content farms" - websites that copy material from other sites in order to get hits.

Where a keyword search may previously have returned their site on Google's first page, afterwards it may be relegated to further down the rankings.

When the update, known as "Panda", was rolled out on 11 April, Google published a blog post explaining that it was designed to "reduce rankings for low-quality sites-sites which are low-value add for users."

Shopping and price comparison sites such as Ciao.co.uk sometimes suffer when Google algorithms change because they carry comments and reviews replicated elsewhere on the internet.

However, experts said that it was unusual to see a legitimate website hit as badly as Ciao.

"A 94% drop is astronomical," said Sanjay Shelat, a search engine optimisation (SEO) specialist at Edit Optimisation.

"It is very unusual to take such a hit in an update. That is enough to put a company under."

Competition case

Ciao.co.uk was involved involved in initiating an EU investigation into Google in November 2010.

Its parent company, Microsoft claims that the Google has used its dominant position to limit rivals' products.

The BBC asked Microsoft if it thought the current downgrading of Ciao results was related to the legal action, Microsoft said it would not be commenting on the situation "at this time".

When questioned by news agency AFP, Google's Scott Huffman said: "If you think of the scale of what we are talking about, it is almost absurd to say we could rig results."

Mr Huffman pointed-out that the update had received a very positive response from Google users.

Search visibility

Searchmetrics analysed Google results in response to a range of keywords, both before and after the Panda update.

Alongside Ciao's 94% reduction in visibility, it found that hubpages.com fell by 85% and eHow.co.uk dropped 53%.

A Similar analysis by Sistrix found a 81% drop in visibility for Ciao.co.uk, 72% reduction for hubpages.com and an 84% fall for eHow.co.uk.

While a sharp drop in visibility may constitute a crisis for some websites and their search engine optimisation (SEO) engineers, it does not necessarily spell disaster.

Technology news website Electricpig.co.uk was downgraded by 94% by the Panda update, according to Searchmetrics.

Site editor James Holland told BBC News: "We haven't seen an immediate impact.

"Comparing our traffic from Google for that week, we're actually only down 0.5% versus the week before Panda took effect.

"That suggests most of the keywords Searchmetrics are measuring us against weren't being clicked anyway, and our best-performing stuff is still doing the business."



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text Feed | Amazon AffiliateHud Settlement Statement

Google prospers under new leader

Internet giant Google has reported a sharp rise in first-quarter earnings, the first figures with co-founder Larry Page back at the helm as boss.

The world's leading search engine reported $6.54bn (�4bn) in net revenue in the first quarter, up 29% from $5.06bn the same time a year ago.

Google has about a 65% share of the US search engine market and about 90% in Europe.

The firm said it would continue "to invest for the long term".

Announcing the results, Patrick Pichette, Google chief finance officer, said: "These results demonstrate the value of search and search ads to our users and customers, as well as the extraordinary potential of areas like display and mobile."

UK revenues shrink

During the quarter, paid clicks - which measures the number of times people click on Google ads that are sponsored by the advertisers - rose by 18%.

Meanwhile, average cost-per-click for its search advertisements increased by about 8% on the same quarter 12 months earlier, and decreased about 1% from the fourth quarter of 2010.

However, on some measures Google came in below analysts' expectations.

Revenues from the UK were $969m, representing 11% of income in the first quarter of 2011, against 13% in the first quarter of 2010.

The firm has been engaged on a staff hiring spree, looking to employ more than 6,000 workers this year, but that has been driving up its costs.

"Clearly the company is still in growth mode and for Google that means spending too," said Jordan Rohan, analyst at financial services firm Stifel Nicolaus.

He said Google was spending on sales and marketing, and "they've hired 1,900 more people this quarter, which might be a new high".

In trading of its shares after the New York Stock Market closed, Google stock fell by 4% to $553.09.



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text Feed | Amazon AffiliateHud Settlement Statement

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Spotify cuts back on free music

Online music service Spotify is halving the amount of free music that users can listen to.

Current users of its free service will be limited to 10 hours per month, half the time currently offered.

New users will only be able to listen to individual tracks five times per month when the new version of the service goes live in May.

The news has angered fans who accuse the firm of seeking to change its model from free to paid.

This is something denied by the firm.

Ken Parks, Spotify's chief content officer told the BBC: "Our chief priority is to keep the free service, which is what has made Spotify so popular.

"We're a company whose ambition is to offer all the world's music to everyone which means growing the business and our user base to many times its current size."

"Everything we do is designed to ensure our users continue to have access to an amazing free experience," he added.

Last month, the online music service announced that it had one million paying subscribers across Europe.

But the majority of its 6.67m listeners use the free service, which is subsidised by adverts.

So long

Announcing the new plans in its blog the firm said that the changes would mainly affect heavier users.

"Most of you use Spotify to discover music - on average over 50 new tracks per month, even after a year," it said.

"For anyone who thinks they might reach these limits, we hope you'll consider checking our our Unlimited and Premium services."

Experts have said that Spotify's long-term profitability depends on users switching to the premium services that remove adverts and allow listeners to use smartphones.

"The economics of ad-supported music services just don't add up and Spotify can't survive long-term while it haemorrhages money from its free service," said Mark Mulligan, an analyst with Forrester Research.

One of the big issues for services such as Spotify is the fees demanded by the music industry - which work out at around 1p per play, according to Mr Mulligan.

"The record labels don't like having a permanent free service around, it is like sleeping with the enemy.

"But too many people expect music to be free now and if there are no legitimate free services it will drive them back to the illegal sector," he warned.

The first response on Spotify's blog read: "So long Spotify. It was nice knowing you. Guess I'll go back to pirating music again then."



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text Feed | Amazon AffiliateHud Settlement Statement